Screams from the Porch
Politics, rants, raves, creative writing and other cool stuff
Friday, April 27, 2012
Elvis has left the (blogging) building
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Ethics chair opposes law director plan
Dear Charter Review Committee Members,
Unfortunately due to prior commitments, I am unable to speak before the committee tonight during Public Forum. I appreciate the Chair allowing for me to speak to you at your last committee meeting on April 11, 2012. Due to time constraints, I was unable to fully express my concerns.
I am writing in reference to the April 25, 2012 Agenda item no. 9. (8.) under the Discussion heading with reference to Section 3.08-Appointment of Law Director. "Appointment of Law Director by the Mayor effective September 1, 2016. Other branches of government will be allowed to hire on a contract basis an attorney to represent their interests."
I am writing concerning a potential conflict of interest with the appointment of the Law Director and the Ethics Committee. As you may or may not be aware, the process in which ethics complaints are initially received originate with the Law Director's office. Either a sworn complaint is received by the Law Director or a complainant may call the office and speak with the Law Director who then discerns the validity of the concern as to whether it may rise to an ethics violation. The committee as a whole is made aware of sworn complaints that are received however any calls that are made to the Law Director's office and those conversations with complainants are not. This is an appropriate process. I believe, that any verbal complaints received, the Law Director deftly handles and gives appropriate instructions to that citizen based on their complaint and situation.
However, if the Law Director is appointed by the Mayor and can be fired by the Mayor at the Mayor's discretion, my concern is that this allows for any complaints received about the Mayor or any of the Mayor's staff to be manipulated to never rise to a violation or be determined to be a credible complaint, be used to warn any wrongdoers and cover up any malfeasance, or conversely retaliate against any political enemies. In my opinion, the Law Director's loyalties would lie with the Mayor instead of remaining independent.
Additionally, there is a conflict with the language of "other branches of government contracting counsel". The Ethics Committee at one point did have a budget in order to pay for the noticing of its meetings. However, at present, the committee does not have a budget and would be unable to contract outside counsel. As a quasi-governmental body that can make recommendations of violations of T.C.A. to the District Attorney's Office that could result in a criminal charge, it is imperative that the legal advice that the Ethics Committee, a citizen's committee, receives is to be trusted.
To date, I can state that the Law Director has aided in creating Whistleblower Protection and the Process and Rules by which a formal hearing is conducted. Having served on the Ethics Committee during the hearings in which the prior Mayor's administration was found guilty of retaliating against a County employee, I can firmly say that having the Law Director independent of the administration allowed for me to make an informed decision based upon my trust of the Law Director's counsel not political machinations.
I am currently Chair of the Knox County Ethics Committee. Please know that I write this letter to you as a citizen who serves not as a spokesperson for the committee as we have not met nor discussed this matter as a body.
Thank you for your time and attention to these serious matters. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thank you for your willingness to serve.
Sincerely,
Elaine Davis
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Someone survey the teachers 'bout budget
Cause I think the public gives teachers a whole lot more credence than it does a bunch of fat cats with car allowances that rival some house notes.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Shopper sings its support for schools
Election residency issue now in court
Commish briefly talks about homelessness
Thursday, April 19, 2012
City touts green initiatives on Hippie Day
For more information on it, click right smack here.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Who cares if she's not a resident? Heh.
So, in the morning the Knox County Election Commission is supposed to talk about whether State House hopeful, Shelley Breeding, is eligible to run for the newly created 89th seat.
If you’ve been under a rock, here’s a recap right smack here.
In the meantime, Shelley’s lawyer, Bill Stokes, has sent the elections folks a memo – click right smack here for that bad boy – detailing why they she is a resident. And Stokes, along with attorney Jon Cope, dispute state election coordinator Mark Goins’ reason why she isn’t. Click right smack here for that.
This is actually a pretty bizarre case and I can see the arguments both ways. But, here’s why she should be allowed to run. (Since you asked.)
First, she’s a Democrat, so she has a snowball’s chance of winning that seat. (Stacey’s people live out there. Heh.)
Second, fair is fair. I mean you have a Republican on the local Election Commission that pretty much anyone with a brain believes committed voter fraud.
SEVEN TIMES!
So, I figure: If no one gave a rat’s a$$ about that, why should they care if someone who doesn’t live in the county runs for the seat?
Ramblings, yappings from da Porch
So, awhile back I got tickets to check out Diamond Dave and the boys in Nashville later this month. And today, I see that they're playing in Knoxville on Aug. 4. What the deuce? Someone suggested I sell the Nashville tickets and hold off, but I figure the band will have broken up by then.
A couple things/feel like rambling.
Best Buy should rename its Geek Squad the “We Suck/Suck Squad.”
The other day I posted about a proposal from the Charter Review Committee that would require the pension board to increase its membership to include finance experts (whatever that means) and to send its annual operating budget to the mayor and County Commission for approval. Well, as one pension board member noted to me yesterday, four commissioners and the mayor sit on the pension board, so aren't they pretty much doing that already?
My Twitter account got one of those viruses where it sends messages to contacts. If you got one it wasn't from me. I think the problem has been fixed.
County Mayor Tim Burchett over this weekend was in Athens, metal detecting with his former finance director, Burton Webb. He took me metal hunting with him once. Just goes to show that he'll hang out with anyone. Heh.
There's some rumors going around that the school folks have six votes on the County Commission to raise taxes to fund the system's proposed $35 million education plan. At this point, that's BS. That could change, but I doubt it. (At the most, they'd pass a waaaay slimmed down version, but I don't even see that happening.) All sides will meet May 22 to talk more about it. Expect someone to have a substitute plan in place before then. (No, this has nothing to do with a slimmed down version.)
And speaking of school stuff. The other day I saw a large, dark bird circling above the Andrew Johnson Building. I'm sure it doesn't mean anything.
Finally, I know it's unorthodox, but taking a whiz on campfires always seems to extinguish them. What say we send a couple hundred homeless and a couple dozen kegs down to the mulch fire and see if we can't put this thing out.
KTSC duties possibly up for bid next week
The county's administration next week could officially start the bidding process for the duties currently performed by the Knoxville Tourism and Sports Corp. All of this, of course, was initiated after a member of the KTSC board said Mayor Tim Burchett bullied them into ending their contract early. (The mayor since then has publicly referred to the gentleman as “the big dog.” I'm not kidding.)
Anyhoo, county Purchasing Director Hugh Holt, who by default of his job with the county, has somehow found himself caught in the middle of this pending S-storm in which no one will win. In the meantime, though, he said he's talked to a number of organizations with such fancy acronyms as CVB and DMO and POS and HEH in an effort to put together a document with its own fancy acronym: RFI.
The RFI (henceforth known as a Request for Information) should be complete sometime next week. Holt said he's sought input from a number of outlets engaged in the convention, tourism and marketing something or others and he's “trying to attack it from as many points as possible.”
He also plans to get some input from KTSC – which will also bid on the proposal if necessary – later this week.
Here's the original story right smack here.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Odd twist to finance director firing story
Jesse Osbourne, the editor of the Springfield Sun over in Kentucky, has a story about former Knox County Finance Director Burton Webb's predicament. You can find it right smack here.
Osbourne touches on Webb's firing but also delves a little bit into the background of Will Singleton, the Washington County, KY man who took his case against Webb to the grand jury.
In it, Osbourne notes that “Singleton has been involved in a previous legal battle against his former employer, Select Specialty Hospital in Lexington.”
There's allegations of racism, wrongful termination and improper dispensing of pills. Or something like that. Strange stuff.
Read Osbourne's story and also click right smack here for some other details of the case.
In the meantime, Webb contacted me about his case. Looks like he's going to get a Kentucky lawyer and fight the allegations. He has some documents that show Singleton might actually owe him some coin. There's a hearing of some sort set for April 25.
If you can't access the story, here it is:
An indictment in Washington County earlier this year had serious implications for a man in Knox County, Tenn.
Burton Webb, listed on the indictment as residing in Athens, Tenn., was charged with theft by failure to make required disposition of property over $10,000.
According to the Knoxville News-Sentinel in Knoxville, Tenn., Webb was recently appointed as the Knox County Finance Director.
After Webb’s indictment was discovered, he was fired from the position.
“It is apparent that Burton Webb’s legal problems are more extensive than either he or I realized, and this afternoon (Friday) I became aware of an issue that he is going to have to address,” Knox
County Mayor Tim Burchett said in a press release.“I have spoken with Burton, and he understands that he will no longer be employed by Knox County.”
Will Singleton, a Washington County resident, said on Monday in a phone interview that he hired Webb last fall to build a log cabin.
Singleton, sole owner of Double Dee Holdings, said he paid Webb over $140,000 to build a log cabin.
Of that, $22,000 was for doors and windows. Those materials were never delivered.
Singleton said he had to buy new interior and exterior doors, which cost approximately $12,000.
He said Webb also shorted him another $7,000 to $8,000 in materials.Singleton said he had to drive to the northern part of Ohio to find replacement windows.
He also said he’s been unable to locate Webb. Singleton added that he’s sent over 100 emails trying to reach him.
Singleton said that Webb has supposedly closed down the company that was under contract to build the cabin, Tennessee Log and Timber Homes, but added, “something shady is going on.”
He said he wanted to have Webb extradited to Washington County and arrested.
Chris H. Trew, Webb’s attorney, said that Webb has closed the company, though he doesn’t remember the date.
He said that the housing market, specifically the niche market for log homes, took a big hit, along with the rest of the housing industry.
Trew said he considers this case a civil matter and that Singleton used the criminal system to gain an advantage.
He added that Singleton still has obligations under the contract and owes money to Tennessee Log and Timber Homes.
Trew said that Webb is in the process of retaining an attorney in Kentucky to try and solve the issue.
“What the corporation owes Mr. Singleton is some doors,” Trew said. The amount, he added, was less than $10,000.
Trew said that the charge of theft, which is listed on the indictment, is inaccurate.
He said that he and his client deny theft, but if it were theft, it would have occurred in Tennessee and not in Kentucky.
If it was determined that a theft took place, his question, he said, is where and when did it occur. If theft occurred, he said, it occurred in Tennessee.
According to the Kentucky Court of Justice website, Webb’s case is scheduled for review on April 25 at 9 a.m.
Previous legal battleSingleton has been involved in a previous lawsuit against his former employer, Select Specialty Hospital in Lexington.
According to an opinion filed about the case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Singleton’s case originated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
Singleton filed a claim of unlawful retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The employer, Select, alleged that it “terminated Singleton for numerous and ongoing errors pertaining to Singleton’s documentation of narcotics administration and patient pain levels, which it discovered during an investigation it initiated following the discrepancy in the count of a narcotic Singleton was responsible for administering.”
At both the district and court of appeals level, Singleton was ruled against.
At the district level, he was given a summary judgement, dismissing the case.
He appealed the judgement to the United States Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals voted 2-1 in favor of Select.
On Monday afternoon via telephone interview, Singleton confirmed that he was involved in the lawsuit.
He said that he sued Select because he did the right thing and he was fired. As a result, he said, they slandered him.
Singleton said he blew the whistle on some discriminating practices and was punished as a result.
In the Court of Appeals opinion, a 23-page document, it outlines three occasions during a three-and-a-half month period in which Singleton filed formal complaints alleging racist behavior among staff at the hospital.
According to the court opinion, each instance was investigated.
Nearly a week after the third formal complaint, an incident arose over a discrepancy in a medication dispensing machine.
An investigation began on Singleton, which included an examination of “his documentation and narcotics control practices over the most recent six weeks.”
Singleton was suspended without pay while the investigation occurred. He was later fired for “failing to meet nursing practice standards related, but not limited to, control of narcotic medications and proper documentation of pain assessment and narcotic administration.”
In the opinion, it cites that Singleton was shown charts he had prepared that contained inconsistencies and errors he couldn’t account for.
“With respect to more than one patient to whom Singleton had given morphine, for example, Singleton admitted that there was no place on their charts where he had documented how many milligrams of the drug he had administered,” according to the court opinion.
The opinion also cited that Singleton was administering medicine to patients that didn’t need it.
“Singleton was unable to explain why, on one chart, he had administered morphine to a patient that had been resting comfortably for several hours, and whom Singleton had rated a ‘zero’ on a pain scale of zero to 10,” according to the opinion.
Circuit Judge Damon J. Keith wrote a dissenting opinion.
He disagreed with the majority, arguing that a jury could find that Singleton was correct in some of his claims.
Keith stated that Singleton presented data logs that demonstrated the carelessness of how Select managed pharmaceuticals.
The medicine dispensing machine was shown to have 343 discrepancies in over a year’s time, Keith wrote.
Keith said that Select “solicited, but never received or reviewed, Singleton’s drug test” that came as a result of his investigation.
Singleton, via phone on Monday, said he passed a urine test and was denied a blood test.
According to the opinion, he alleged that Select’s CEO falsely told him that he had failed a drug test, but refused to give him copies of the investigation reports.
The judge also pointed to evaluations of Singleton’s work prior to the incidents.
Singleton was given high ratings, especially in pain assessment.
“The tides only turned a week after Singleton submitted a racial complaint,” Keith wrote.
Then, he wrote, the errors Singleton committed became extreme.
Keith concluded that the case should be left for a jury to decide.
The Court of Appeals opinion can be found online by searching for “Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals + Will Singleton.” The document is located at law.justia.com.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Twitter accounts getting hacked
Just one more class of criminal whose crime should be punishable by death.